• google scholor
  • Views: 9342

  • PDF Downloads: 762

Use of Industrial Waste Water for Agricultural Purpose: Pb and Cd in Vegetables in Bikaner City, India

Rajendra Singh1 * , R. S. Verma2 and Yogita Yadav3

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.7.2.14

Shortage of irrigation water resources is leading to the use of domestic and industrial waste water in agriculture. esp. in urban areas. Being contaminated by metals and various toxic chemicals these waste waters leads to the exposure of heavy metals and hazardous chemicals and the subsequent human health hazards through agriculture products and live stocks. Increasing cases of cancer and kidney problems is also related with this aspect. In present study human health risk assessment taken in concern with the respect of some heavy metals of toxicological interest.

Waste Water; Contaminated; Health Hazards; Health Assessment; Heavy Metals

Copy the following to cite this article:

Singh R, Verma R.S, Yadav Y. Use of Industrial Waste Water for Agricultural Purpose: Pb and Cd in Vegetables in Bikaner City, India. Curr World Environ 2012;7(2):287-286 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.7.2.14

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Singh R, Verma R.S, Yadav Y. Use of Industrial Waste Water for Agricultural Purpose: Pb and Cd in Vegetables in Bikaner City, India. Curr World Environ 2012;7(2):287-286. Available from: http://www.cwejournal.org/?p=2884


Download article (pdf)
Citation Manager
Publish History


Article Publishing History

Received: 2012-07-12
Accepted: 2012-09-17

Introduction
 
Decreasing water level and shortage of water is being a major problem world wide. For agriculture purpose this problem gives rise to the use of alternative sources of water. Most of these water sources are affected by the dumping of waste from various types of industries like mining, textiles, chemical etc. Due to reason this waste water may contains many organic toxic substances that could have hazardous impact on human health. In addition, technological development has contributed to increase other industrial dumping that contaminates surface waters.

The irregular disposal of industrial wastes has created pollution problems since this waste is disseminated in the environment or is accumulated in sediments, aquatic organisms, and water.

There are many studies on the possible effects of chemical substances on humans through laboratory.

Experiments in animals and information are available on the incidence of cancer by prolonged exposure to toxic substances. Experiments in plants and insects, as the Drosophila (fruit fly), demonstrate that toxic substances of chemical origin induce genetic mutations and chromosome aberrations. These experiments demonstrate that exists a risk, but it is not simple to extrapolate these results to human beings.

The population is exposed to toxic chemical compounds through the use of wastewater in agriculture. Theoretically, wastewater of  industrial origin should not be used for this purpose but in developing countries formal and clandestine industries dispose of their effluents to the municipal sewerage with or without authorization and without any treatment. This exposes the population, to relatively small quantities for chemical compounds and may produce chronic intoxications with serious consequences.

Another health hazard pose by inadequate disposal of wastewater is the use of sediments for soil improvement because they contain toxic elements that may accumulate (PAHO, 1989).

The environmental impact of chemical residues in wastewater used for irrigation and the prediction of their effects on human health are a very complex matter. In addition, it should be considered that the standards of developed countries do not apply to areas with different characteristics. The factors that influence the nature and intensity of the impact on health are: the climate, nutritional status, genetic predisposition, type of work and exposure level.

The indiscriminate use of pesticides also influences the deterioration of water quality. This resource can be contaminated by runoffs from crops, atmospheric precipitations and, to a lesser extent, by domestic sewage. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), present in lager quantity in pesticides and other organochlorine compounds, are degraded very slowly in the environment and are bioaccumulative, thus, they represent a potential danger. Air and water are vehicles through which PCB are dispersed in the environment, although food also constitute an important vehicle. As a consequence, PCB residues are found in living organisms form many regions. The highest concentrations are usually present neat industrial areas.

Industrialization and urban development without adequate planning increase human health hazards by exposure to chemical substances through air, water sediments, and food. The nature of this risk and its potential danger has been recognized a few years ago and its effects still have not been evaluated (PAHO, 1990).

The identification and confirmation of such effects are difficult because epidemiological studies last long, the population migrates, and exposure time is unknown. In addition, chronic diseases can have various causes and, in many cases, they are not classified correctly.

Usually, in developing countries there is not statistical information on the trends and causes of diseases produced by ingestion of chemical substances through agricultural and livestock products. However, several studies have deconstructed adsorption of heavy metals by plants, such as wheat and rich that can affect the consumers (WHO, 1992). An epidemiological evidence was the case of Toyama, Japan, where the population was affected by the ingestion of cadmium contained in rice; the origin of this element was a nearby mine that contaminated the irrigation water.

The nature of human health hazards by exposure to toxic chemical compounds varies considerably. In general, they increase birth defects, abortions and certain forms of cancer, and decrease the average weight of children at birth.

Case study

W astewater use in agriculture in bikaner, india
 

The study “health risk evaluation due to wastewater use in agriculture” was conducted in four agricultural areas (Bikaner East, Karni Industrial area, central market, Reliance fresh retail outlet). General objective of the study To evaluated the chemical-toxicological level of contamination of the agricultural products irrigated with raw and treated wastewater.

Specific objectives
 
  • To determine the concentration of toxic heavy metals and synthetic organic compounds (pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls) in rivers, raw wastewater and treated wastewater used for irrigation.
  • To determine to concentration of toxic heavy metals, pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls in agricultural and livestock products (vegetables and milk) form areas irrigated with water of rivers, raw wastewater and treated wastewater.
  • To compare the potential risk associated with toxic chemical compounds present in waters of rivers, raw wastewater and treated wastewater used to irrigate agricultural and livestock products.
  • To train professionals in the measurement of metallic organic toxic substances and, thus, to increase the local analytical capacity.
  • However the present paper is mainly concerned with some heavy metals of toxicological interest.

Methodology

The study was conducted in Bikaner, India to evaluate the presence and concentration of toxic chemical compounds in waters used for irrigation and in agricultural and livestock products from areas of reuses, a control area, and markets. In addition, soils and sludge were analyzed. The areas selected for the study were: Bikaner East, (control area), karni industrial area (use of industrial and domestic waste water) central market (use of ground water and canal water) reliance fresh retail outlet. Analyses of metals, pesticides, and PCB were carried out in all water samples. The following analytical procedures were applied:

Water

The analytical methodologies proposed by the Health and Welfare, Ottawa, Canada, National Water Research (Burlington) and by the Standard Methods (15a. edition, 1985) were used.

Agricultural products

The recommendations of the Health Protection Branch Laboratory, Food Laboratory, Toronto, Canada, and the analytical methodologies of CEPIS developed with the support of JICA were applied.

Soil and sludge

The methodologies proposed by USPEA and by the standard Methods (15a. edition, 1985) were adopted.

For analytical quality control, measurements were subject to an analytical quality control program developed by CEPIS laboratory and the methodology used by international authorities.

Recovery tests were performed with selected samples to which known quantities of analite were added, in addition, control tests of distilled water and solvents for pesticides and PCB were done.

Results

With respect to the results, in industrial wastewater high levels of heavy metals were found: arsenics (7 to 220µg/1), (5 to 43µg/1), lead (10 1  253µg/1), copper (50 to 250µg/1), iron (1.800 to 6.400µg/1), and zinc (60 to 2.460µg/1), (see Figure 1). Chlorinated pesticides in different sampling points were very low (<700ng/1). With regard to PCB, the highest value was detected in Bikaner east (270µg/1). In general, removal of heavy metals, pesticides, and PCB is produced in stabilization ponds.
Fig. 1: Metals of toxicological interest in irrigation water Figure 1: Metals of toxicological
interest in irrigation water

Click here to View table

The agricultural and livestock products selected for the study were: Reddish Potato, Brinjal, Carrot, Cabbage, and milk from the areas of study and nearby markets. The highest value of lead was detected in brinjal samples from markets (0,037µg/) (see Table 1). Cadmium does not constitute and problem in the areas studies. With regard to metal concentration and hygiene agriculture products available at Reliance fresh outlet were found to be best.
 
Table 1: Lead and cadmium in agricultural products Table 1: Lead and cadmium in agricultural products
Click here to View table

Conclusion

The use of industrial wastewater in agriculture and livestock represent and potential risk for health, due to the toxic nature of chemical compounds and to the concentrations to which the products are exposed. Irrigation water with low levels of lead (around 30 µg/1) has a minimum influence in the toxicological quality of vegetables whose edible part grows beneath the soil. Vegetables growing at the soil surface level may be contaminated by atmospheric emissions containing lead. For irrigation water, the permissible limit values of toxic chemical compounds should not be regarded as absolute values, but should be adapted to the local conditions considering contributions from other sources. Wastewater treatment by means of stabilization ponds as well as commonly available treatment plants removes toxic elements when low Concentrations are found in raw wastewater.
 
  • The establishment of permissible maximum limits of toxic substances should be studied for irrigation water considering conditions of soil, types of plant, and bioaccumulation.
  • Metal Toxicity Seems to be a significant factor for the increasing cases of cancer and kidney dieses.
  • A continuous study with this respect and keen public awareness is required.
  • A responsible planning    implementation and strict regulation of environmental laws is required.
  • State government seems to do only table and data work only as posing itself aware with the respect of human health and environmental perspective on national and international desk.
  • Delayed effects of this governmental and public unawareness may result as serious human health hazard
     
References
 
  1. Anderson PR, Christensen TH., Distribution coefficients of Cd, Co, Ni and Zn in soils. J Soil Sci 39:15-22 (1988). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1988.tb01190.x
  2. Baes CF III, Sharp RD, Sjoreen AL, Shor RW. A Review and Analysis of Parameters for Assessing Transport of Environmentally Released Radionuclides through Agriculture. DE85-000287. Springfield, VA:US Departmen of Commerce, National Technical Information Service (1984). http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/6355677
  3. Calabrese EJ, Stanek EJ, Pekow P, Barnes RM., Soil ingestion estimates for children residing on a superfund site. Ecotox Environ Safe 36: 258-268 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1996.1511
  4. Chronopoulos J, Haidouti C, Chronopoulou- Sereli A, Massas I., Variations in plant and soil lead and cadmium content in urban parks in Athens, Greece. Sci Total Environ 196: 91-98 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(96)05415-0
  5. Dalenberg JW, Van Driel W., Contribution of atmospheric deposition to heavy-metals concentrations in field crops. Neth J Agrci 38: 396-379 (1990).
  6. DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). Total Diet Study— Aluminium, Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel,  Selenium, Tin and Zinc. London:The Stationery Office (1999).
  7. DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) and Environment Agency. Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment Model (CLEA): Technical Basis and Algorithms. Bristol, UK:Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and The Environment Agency.. 2002b. Contaminants in Soil: Collation of Toxicological Data and Intake Values for Humans. CLR9. Bristol (2002a).
  8. Hawley JK., Assessment of health risk from exposure to contaminated soil. Risk Anal 5: 289-302 (1985). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00185.x
  9. Hérbert CD., Subchronic toxicity of cupric sulphate administered in drinking water and feed to rats and mice. Fundam Appl Toxicol 21: 461-475 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/faat.1993.1122
  10. Hough RL. 2002. Applying Models of Trace Metal Transfer to Hough RL, Young SD, Crout NMJ., Modelling of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Znuptake, by winter wheat and forage maize, froma sewage disposal farm. Soil Use Manage 19: 19-27 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2003.tb00275.x
  11. Keefer RF, Singh RN, Horvath DJ., Chemical composition of vegetables grown on an agricultural soil amended with sewage sludges. J Environ Qual 15: 146-152 (1986). http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq1986.00472425001500020012x
  12. Konz J, Lisi K, Friebele E., Exposure Factors Handbook. EPA/600/8-89/043. Washington, DC:U.S (1989).
  13. Northwood Geoscience Ltd., Vertical Mapper for MapInfoVersion 1.5. Nepean, Ontario, Canada:Northwood Geoscience Ltd (1996).
  14. Reilly C., Metal Contamination of Food. 2nd ed.speciation of Pb2+ and Cu2+. Environ Toxicol Chem 17: 1481-1489 (1991).
  15. Shao J., Linear model selection by crossvalidation. J Am Stat Assoc 88: 486-494 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476299
  16. Stanek EJ, Calabrese EJ, Zorn M., Soil ingestion estimates for Monte Carlo risk assessment in children. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 7: 357-368 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018091094402
  17. Sterrett SB, Chaney RL, Gifford CH, Meilke HW., Influence of fertilizer and sewage sludge compost on yield of heavy metal accumulation by lettuce grown in urban soils. Environ Geochem Health 18: 135-142 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01771236
  18. B.D. Gharde, Orient J. Chem., 26(1): 175-180 (2010).
  19. Trowbridge PR, Burmaster DE., A parametric distribution for the fraction of outdoor soil in indoor dust. J Soil Contam 6: 161-168 (1997).
  20. Teuschler LK, Dourson ML, Stiteler WM, McClure P, Tully H., Health risk above the reference dose for multiple chemicals. Regul Toxicol Pharm 30: S19-S26 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/rtph.1999.1321
  21. Arokiyaraj, R. Vijayakumar and P. Martin, Orient J. Chem., 27(4): 1711-1716 (2011).
  22. Van Lune P., Cadmium and lead in soils and crops from allotment gardens in the Netherlands. Neth J Agric Sci 35: 207-210 (1987).
  23. Waalkes MP, Rehm S., Cadmium and prostate cancer. J Toxicol Environ Health 43: 251-269 (1994). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15287399409531920
  24. Wang XJ, Smethhurst PJ, Herbert AM., Relationships between three measures of organic matter or carbon in soils of eucalypt plantations in Tasmania. Aust J Soil Res 34: 545-553 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SR9960545