• google scholor

  • Views: 2912

  • PDF Downloads: 256

Status of Rotifers and Copepods in high altitude pond Sarkoot located in district Kishtwar of J&K

Romana Akhtar1 *

1 Department of Zoology, University of Jammu, Jammu, 180 006 India

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.2.2.07

The high altitude Sarkoot pond located at Kishtwar (33o.0’ – 34o.0’N latitude and 75o.0’ – 76o.45’ E longitude) at an altitude of 5300 ft. and having a maximum depth of 12 feet with its present expanse of 37.33 kanals is presently being put to the illogical and undesired use. The pond being rich source of zooplanktons can hold a variety of fishes but due to its unfavourable physico-chemical conditions remains unexploited scientifically.


Rotifer and Copepod fauna; Population Dynamics; Sarkoot Pond

Copy the following to cite this article:

Akhtar R. Status of Rotifers and Copepods in high altitude pond Sarkoot located in district Kishtwar of J&K. Curr World Environ 2007;2(2):145-148 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.2.2.07

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Akhtar R. Status of Rotifers and Copepods in high altitude pond Sarkoot located in district Kishtwar of J&K. Curr World Environ 2007;(2):145-148. Available from: http://www.cwejournal.org/?p=665

Download article (pdf)
Citation Manager
Publish History

Article Publishing History

Received: 2007-10-15
Accepted: 2007-11-24

Introduction

Sarkoot pond is situated in highly mountainous area in district Kishtwar of J&K state. The pond being picturesque can be developed as a tourist spot once restored with its pristine beauty, its water quality improved and fish cultured and introduced for sport. This pond has the potential of being a good source of fishes as it contains a healthy amount of zooplanktons like rotifers and copepods. Both rotifers and copepods are well recognized secondary consumers and an important source of food for fishes and also act as an indicator of trophic status besides water quality of an aquatic ecosystem.

Material and Methods

The present study was conducted for period of one year from March (2002) to February (2003). Plankton sample were collected every month from Sarkoot pond (natural earthen pond) located at Kishtwar of J&K state. The three study station (Station I, Station II and Station III) were established along the pond circumference. Each Sample was collected by filtering 50L of water through plankton net. Filtrate was collected in 20ml plastic bottle and 5% formalin was added to preserve the sample for further studies in the laboratory. Plankton species belonging to rotifera and copepoda were identified with the help of standard literature (Edmondson, 1959; Pennak, 1968; Adoni, 1985).
 

Figure 1: Showing different peaks of Rotifera and Copepods from March 2002-February 2003
Click here to view figure


Results and Discussion

Rotifers in Sarkoot pond are represented by fourteen species viz., Brachionus bidentata, B. rubens, B. Calyciflorus, B. patulus, B. quadridentata, Asplanchna sps., Filinia longiseta, Testidunella sps., Keratella tropica, Lepedella sps., Mytillina ventralis, Monostyla bulla, Lecane quadridentata, Philodina sps. whereas Copepods were represented by five species viz., Cyclops sps., Nauplius, Mesocyclops leuckarti, M. hyalinus, Diaptomus sps.
 

Table 1: List of rotifers and copepod species identified from the three study stations during March 2002 to February 2003
Click here to view table


The dominance of rotifers over other groups has also been reported by Sewell (1934); Alikunhi (1957); Michael (1968); Jindal and Vashisht (1985) and Kumar (1990).
 

Table 2 : Seasonal variation in Rotifera and Copepoda in Sarkoot pond (Kishtwar) from March (2002) to February (2003)
Click here to view table


According to George (1966), the abundance of rotifers followed by other groups like Cladocera and Cepepoda is an indicator of entrophic nature of water body. Qualitative predominance of rotifers has also been observed in high altitude water bodies of Kashmir by Zutshi et al., (1980), Zutshi and Vass (1982) and Yousuf et al., (1986). The dominance of rotifers is thus linked with rich benthos and phytoplankton which characters holds true for present pond where sewage of the entire town is flushed in and it stays there for natural putrification.
 

Table 3 : Showing different peaks of Zooplankton from March (2002) to February (2003)
Click here to view table


The rotifers shows their seasonal presence and they are totally absent in the month of May, July and August. On the other hand Copepods shows their perennial presence in this pond Table 1. Similar planktonic presence of various zooplanktonic groups has also been reported earlier by Schonborn (1962), Jyoti and Sehgal (1980), Zutshi and Vass (1982) and Yousuf et al., (1984, 1986). A look at the Table 2 also reveals that quantatively rotifers acquire peak during January, February and March and the spurt in population is because of the addition of new class being produced through successive reproductive ability of plankton. On the other hand copepods, acquire two distinct population peaks during March-April and October – November. Smith et al. (1979), Nayak (1986) and Gochait and Nayak (1990) also reported such bimodal peaks in different aquatic habitats.

Such rich amount and quality of rotifers and copepods found in this pond are enough to support a variety of organisms if present there. The bottom of Sarkoot pond also comprises annelids and arthropods which on the other hand can also support a variety of fishes.

Presence of healthy total population of zooplanktons like rotifers and Copepods in Sarkoot pond, therefore suggests that pond can meet the needs of varieties of fish (fin or shell fish) that depends on zooplankton as their food.

References
 

  1. Adoni, A.D. Work book on limnology. Pratibha Publishers C-10 Gour Nagar, Sagar, - 470 003, India.(1985) pp. 216.
  2. Alikunhi. H.H. Fish culture in India. Farm Bulletin of ICAR, New Delhi. (1957) No. 2, pp.1-150.
  3. Edmondson, W.T. Rotifera, In W.T. Edmondson (ed.) Ward and Whipple, Fresh Water Biology, 2 edn. John Wiley, MY : (1959) 420-494.
  4. George, M.G. Diurnal variations in Physico-chemical factors and zooplankton in the surface layers of three freshwater fish ponds. Indian J Fish. (1966) 13: 1-2.
  5. Gochait, B.C. and Nayak, L.D.. Status of cladocerans in the river Buddhabalanga at Baripada (Orissa). Poc. 77th Ind. Sc. Cong. Part III, Cochin, India-Sec. VIII : (1990) 23-24.
  6. Jindal, R. and Vashisht, H.S. (1985). Ecology of freshwater pond at Nabha (Punjab, India). Zoologica orientalis. 2 (1–2) : 74–83.
  7. Jyoti, M.K. and Sehgal, H. Rotifer fauna of Jammu (J&K), India, Part I. Loricates. Limnologica (Berlin). (1980) 1921 : 121-126.
  8. Kumar, S. Limnology of Kunjwani pond, Jammu with reference to plankton and Macrophytes. M.Phil. dissertation, Submitted to University of Jammu (1990).
  9. Micheal, R.G.. Studies on the bottom fauna in a tropical freshwater pond. Hydrobiologia, (1968) 31:203-230.
  10. Nayak, L.D. Studies in limnological factors of river Mahanadi at Sambalpur. Ph.D. Thesis, Sambalpur University, India (1986).
  11. Pennak, R.W..Field and experimental limnology of three Colorado mountain lakes. Ecology, (1968) 19 (3) : 505-20.
  12. Schonborn, W. Uber Plantismur and Zyklomorphose bei, Difflugia limnetica (Levander). Penard. Limnologica (1962) 1: 21-34.
  13. Sewell, R.B.S. Studies on the bionomics of freshwater in India, II on the fauna of tank in the Indian Museum compound and seasonal changes observed. Int. Rev. Hydrobiologia. (1934) 31: 203-208.
  14. Smith, G.A., Fitzpatrick, L.C. and Pearson, W.D. Structure and dynamics of zooplankton community in a small north central Texas pond ecosystem. South West Nat. (1979) 24(1):1-16.
  15. Yousuf, A.R., Masood, H.B. and Qadri, M.Y. Summer and Winter cladoceran communities of the Anchar lake, Kashmir, Geobios, New Reports, (1984) 3: 66-69.
  16. Yousuf, A.R., Shah, G.M. and Qadri, M.Y. Some lomnological aspects of Mirgund wet Land. Geobios, New Reports, (1986) 5(1) : 27-36.
  17. Zutshi, D.P., Subla, B.A., Khan, M.A. and Wanganeo, A. Comparative limnolgy of nine lakes of Jammu and Kashmir Himalayas. Hydrobiologia, (1980) 72: 101-112.
  18. Zutshi, D.P. and Vass, K.K.. Limnological studies on Dal Lake – III. Biological features. Proc. Ind. Nat. Sci. Acad. (1982) 48(2): 234-241.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.