• google scholor
  • Views: 3210

  • PDF Downloads: 101

Recovery Efficiency of an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Experiment from Saline Aquifer under Controlled Conditions

Abhishek Anand Kaushal1 , Gopal Krishan2 * and Govind Pandey1

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.15.3.07

Present work was carried out in an experimental model developed at the institute, sand was used as prototype artificial aquifer and was saturated with highly saline water having Electrical Conductivity (EC) equal to 8500 µS/cm. Fresh water with average EC = 467.50 µS/cm and temperature = 25oC was injected in the known amount in the saline water and this water was extracted at a fixed time interval of 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4, 8 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours in a cumulative time of 735.30 hours with average recovery efficiency of 63%. Recovered water has salinity equal to or less than 1000 µS/cm. Although, this experiment was carried out at a small scale but this can be tried at a bigger scale for skillfully managing the surface or reclaimed water in problematic areas where demand exceeds the supply.


Aquifer Storage and Recovery; Experimental Model; Fresh Water; National Hydrology Project; Recovery Efficiency; Saline Water

Copy the following to cite this article:

Kaushal A. A,  Krishan G, Pandey G. Recovery Efficiency of an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Experiment from Saline Aquifer under Controlled Conditions Curr World Environ 2020; 15(3). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.15.3.07

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Kaushal A. A,  Krishan G, Pandey G. Recovery Efficiency of an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Experiment from Saline Aquifer under Controlled Conditions Curr World Environ 2020; 15(3). Available from: https://bit.ly/2HO2CAu


Download article (pdf)
Citation Manager
Publish History


Article Publishing History

Received: 08-06-2020
Accepted: 25-10-2020
Reviewed by: Orcid Orcid Dr. B. Yadav
Second Review by: Orcid Orcid Dr. Rahul Kumar Jaiswal
Final Approval by: Dr. Umesh Kulshrestha

Introduction

Groundwater, a precious dynamic renewable natural resource of earth, is essential for the sustenance of the human life and plays an important role in economic and social progress of a region. During last 4-5 decades ever increasing demands and climate change impacts not only affected availability of this resource in terms of quality and quantity1,2 but also led to variability in space and time.2 Salinity and its intrusion in the fresh water aquifers is the most common groundwater contamination problem in coastal areas as well as in arid and semi-arid regions of the world.3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) system can prove to be important technique for seasonal, durable and future storage of this resource3,4 mainly at the time of its inaccessibility due to contamination, water losses, natural disaster and other unexpected conditions. ASR depends on hydro-geological feasibility determined by soil and sub-surface characteristics which are related to percolation rates, porosity, permeability, water quality and connecting recharge zones.11 Some of the important aquifer characteristics12 are: type, permeability, thickness, storage, pore type, uniformity, groundwater redox and chemsity. Keeping in view above issues, an experiment was carried out at National Institute of Hydrology Roorkee in an experimental model fabricated under World Bank funded, Mewat Purpose Driven Study (PDS) under National Hydrology Project with an aim to recover fresh water from injected saline water and to assess recovery efficiency.

Material and Methods

This experiment was conducted in an experimental model having dimensions: length 125 cm, width 58 cm, height 153 cm (Fig. 1). Two Self-Prime Regenerative Pumps were used for injecting and extracting water. For conducting the experiment, saline solution of concentration 8500 μs/cm was prepared from sodium chloride (NaCl) salt. EC and temperature were measured with EC meter (Eutech). 100 litres of this salt solution with temperature 25°C was inserted in sand of size ranging between 0.075 to 1.00 mm till saturation. Sand is kept in an experiment model for prototype artificial aquifer. The sand with volume of 0.479 m3 was filled to mid-section upto height of 66 cm. After saturating the sand with saline water, fresh water was injected and simultaneously recovered at a certain time interval of 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4, 8 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours. The cumulative hours are 768.30.
 

Figure 1: Experimental Model Layout.


 
The freshwater carrier pipe was connected to the freshwater tank above experiment model to maintain the gravity flow (Fig. 2). 60 litres of freshwater with average EC 467.50 μs/cm and average temperature 24.91°C was injected through the freshwater carrier pipe which was regulated through a tap. Two pipes were fixed upto the bottom of the sand bed. The recovery pipe was connected to the pump with the chuck valve in between to retain water in the pipe (fig. 2).

Figure 2:  Injection and Extraction of Water from Experimental Model



The water was pumped out through the recovery pipe and stored in the cylindrical tank having dimensions (length, bredth, width: 43cm*48cm*24 cm). The recovered water sample was taken in the 50 ml beaker for recording temperature and EC. Water is pumped from the recovery pipe and there are chances of mixing between the freshwater pocket and saline water in the sand due to the suction pressure. Performance of this ASR experiment was quantified by calculating Recovery Efficiency (RE) as volume recovered/volume injected * 100.

Results and Discussion

The electrical conductivity (EC) and temperature of saline water was maintained 8500 µS/cm and 25oC, respectively for the experiment period. Statistical summary of measured parameters, recovered volume and efficiency is given in Table 1. EC of injected freshwater was found in the range of 320– 580 µS/cm with an average value of 467.50 µS/cm and temperature ranged from 21.1°C – 31.7°C with an average value of 24.91°C. EC of recovered was found in the range of 830– 7200 µS/cm with an average value of 1664.05 µS/cm and temperature ranged from 21.1°C – 31.7°C with average value of 24.91°C. An average of 60 litres freshwater was injected and a volume of recovered water ranged between 22 to 55 litres with an average value of 36.88 litres. Recovery efficiency (RE) ranged from 40 to 90.42 % with an average of 62.75%. Generally, RE is always less than 100 and mechanisms involved are mixing in the subsurface - density‐gradient driven convection, dispersion and diffusion, rate‐limited mass transfers etc.13,14 Kimbler et al (1975)13 also stressed on that the RE can be increased but with more contaminations.

Table 1: Statistical Summary of Measured Parameters, Volume of Water Injected/Recovered and Recovery Efficiency

Temperature (oC)

EC (µS/cm)

Volume  (litres)

Cumulative Time (Hrs.)

Recovery efficiency (%)

Fresh water

Recovered water

Fresh water

Recovered water

Injected

Recovered

21.10

21.90

320.00

830.00

40.00

22.00

1.00

40.00

31.70

29.80

580.00

7200.00

70.00

55.00

735.30

90.42

24.91

24.96

467.50

1664.05

60.00

36.88

90.92

62.75

2.56

1.72

35.97

1449.54

6.31

7.79

161.09

12.47

 
Figure 3: Variation Of EC and Temperature During 735.30 Hours of Experiment

Click here to view figure.



Variation of EC and temperature with the time is shown in figure 2. It is evident from figure 3 that EC of the recovered water was recorded below 1000 µS/cm after 29 hours. This might be due to mixing reaction of saline and fresh water and EC found almost constant after 30 hour to 735.30 hours. The resultant EC suggests that the concentration of recovered water is less than 12% of saline water concentrations which are in agreement with Kimbler et al13 where the EC of recovered water should be equal to or less than 10%.

Conclusion

Experiment was conducted under controlled conditions to assess recovery rates from saline aquifer. Recovery efficiency of 63% was found with EC of recovered water equal to or less than 1000 µS/cm after 29 hours of experiment.  Aquifer storage and recovery is found to be a significant, suitable tool for water resource management and might act as a hydraulic barrier in saline environments. There is a need to test the experiment under field conditions on a bigger scale to test its fresh water yielding potential.

Acknowledgement

Funding received from National Hydrology Project is duly acknowledged.

Funding

Funding received from National Hydrology Project

Conflict of Interest

The authors do not have any conflict of interest.

References
  1. MacDonald, Alan, Bonsor, Helen, Ahmed, Kazi, Burgess, William, Basharat, Muhammad, Calow, Roger, Dixit, Ajaya, Foster, Stephen, Krishan, Gopal , Lapworth, Daniel , Lark, Murray, Moench, Marcus, Mukherjee, Abhijit, Rao, M.S., Shamsudduha, Mohammad, Smith, Linda, Taylor, Richard, Tucker, Josephine, Steenbergen Frank van, Yadav, Shobha. 2016. Groundwater depletion and quality in the Indo‐Gangetic Basin mapped from in situ observations. Nature Geosciences. 9:762-766.
    CrossRef
  2. Bonsor HC, MacDonald AM, Ahmed KM, Burgess WG, Basharat M, Calow RC, Dixit A, Foster SSD, Gopal K, Lapworth D, Lark RM, Moench M, Mukherjee A, Rao MS, Shamsudduha M, Smith L, Taylor R, Tucker J, van Steenbergen F, Yadav SK. 2017. Hydrogeological typologies of the Indo-Gangetic basin alluvial aquifer, South Asia. Hydrogeology Journal. 25(5): 1377-1406.
    CrossRef
  3. Krishan G., Dasgupta P., and McKenzie, A. (2020) Understanding aquifer systems of Indian Sundarbans. Water Brief 11. The India-UK Water Centre. 31pp. Wallingford, UK and Pune, India
  4. National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee (2019). Improving our understanding aquifer systems of Indian Sundarbans December 2019. The India-UK Water Centre; Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford and Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune.
  5. Krishan, Gopal. 2019. Groundwater Salinity. Curr World Environ 14(2):186-188.
    CrossRef
  6. Krishan, Gopal, Ghosh, N.C., Kumar, C.P., Sharma Mohan, Lalit, Yadav, Brijesh, Kansal, M.L., Singh, Surjeet, Verma, S.K., Prasad, Gokul. 2020. Understanding stable isotope systematics of salinity affected groundwater in Mewat, Haryana, India. J Earth Syst Sci 129, 109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-1380-6.
    CrossRef
  7. Vandenbohede, A., E. Van Houtte, and L. Lebbe (2008), Study of the feasibility of an aquifer storage and recovery system in a deep aquifer in Belgium, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 53, 844– 856.
    CrossRef
  8. Krishan, G, Prasad, G, Anajli, Kumar, C.P., Patidar, N, Yadav, B, Kansal, M.L., Singh, S, Sharma LM, Bardley, A, Verma, S.K. 2020. Identifying the seasonal variability in source of groundwater salinization using deuterium excess- a case study from Mewat, Haryana, India. Journal of Hydrology- Regional Studies, 31: 100724 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100724.
    CrossRef
  9. Krishan G., Dasgupta P., and McKenzie, A. (2020) Understanding aquifer systems of Indian Sundarbans. Water Brief 11. The India-UK Water Centre. 31pp. Wallingford, UK and Pune, India.
  10. National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee (2019). Improving our understanding aquifer systems of Indian Sundarbans December 2019. The India-UK Water Centre; Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford and Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune
  11. Choi J., Skibniewski M., Shim Y-G. (2018). Economics of alternative resources with an emphasis on aquifer storage and recovery. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply, 18 February.
    CrossRef
  12. DEMEAU. (2014). Pre-requisites and design criteria for new MAR systems in compliance with EU WFD and GWD (including pretreatment).
  13. Kimbler, O. K., R. G. Kazmann, and W. R. Whitehead (1975), Cyclic Storage of Fresh Water in Saline Aquifers, 78 pp., Louisiana Water Resources Res. Inst. Bulletin 10, Baton Rouge, LA.
  14. Lu, C., P. Du, Y. Chen, and J. Luo (2011), Recovery efficiency of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) with mass transfer limitation, Water Resour. Res., 47, W08529, doi:10.1029/2011WR010605.
    CrossRef