• google scholor
  • Views: 6935

  • PDF Downloads: 438

‘New Normal’ of COVID-19: Need of New Environmental Standards

Umesh Chandra Kulshrestha1 *

Corresponding author Email: umeshkulshrestha@gmail.com

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.15.2.01

Copy the following to cite this article:

Kulshrestha U. C. ‘New Normal’ of COVID-19: Need of New Environmental Standards. Curr World Environ 2020; 15(2). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.15.2.01

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Kulshrestha U. C. ‘New Normal’ of COVID-19: Need of New Environmental Standards. Curr World Environ 2020; 15(2). Available from: https://bit.ly/3g4q4VV


Download article (pdf)
Citation Manager
Publish History


Article Publishing History

Received: 11-02-2020
Accepted: 20-08-2020

Dear Readers

I am pleased to present before you this issue of Current World Environment. I thank all the contributors of this issue. It is timely completed with the all support from the reviewers, authors and the office staff. This issue has a variety of papers covering atmospheric ammonia, water quality, zero waste method of sustainability, remote sensing use in environmental monitoring and air quality etc.

Air pollution and poor urban air quality have been the major concerns of everyone. Most of air pollution is contributed by the anthropogenic activities which are responsible for the present global warming and climate change.1 During the COVID-19 lockdown when all the fossil fuel driven activities are shut, a drastic reduction in gaseous as well as particulate pollutants has been reported worldwide.2,3 According to a report, New Delhi has experienced around 34% reduction in atmospheric PM2.5 concentrations due to which the AQI is improved by 37%.4 There is a reduction in CO and other pollutants as well. However, the O3 concentrations have been reported increasing in NCR Delhi. The increase in O3 has been attributed to reduction in destruction of O3 due to lesser NO. Also, due to ban on plastic burning and sealing of tire oil units, there is a reduction in HCl and chlorine emissions which has also reduced quenching of O3.5 This pattern of O3 spikes has also been reported before the lockdown (during May 2019), immediately after the steps taken by the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) of the Environmental Pollution Control Authority (EPCA). It is to mention that before the lockdown, the GRAP actions have been helpful in bringing down the pollution level in NCR Delhi6. The major cities have experienced a significant improvement in the air quality. The NOx air quality index (AQI) of Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad and Pune improved by 63%, 57%, 36% and 55% respectively.7 Similar reducing patterns of NO2 have been reported worldwide. Barcelona showed a 50% decrease in NO2 concentrations in 2020 as compared to the previous year8. In China, the NO2 is decreased from 10-30%9. Also, there is a drop in CO2 level at Mauna Loa as reported in March 2020 as compared to the March 2019. Overall, a 24% drop in CO2 emissions from major sources is expected in 202010 (SPECRTEUM news, 2020).

During COVID-19, the `New Normal’ scenario analysis suggests that we need to attempt the following new steps in order to achieve good air quality with higher confidence in predicting possible health impacts-

1. Need to Redefine Particulate Standards

The `New Normal’ scenario of COVID-19 has given us an opportunity to observe minimum values of criteria pollutants such as NO2, SO2, PM2.5, PM10, O3 etc. These are the background values of the pollutants during the lockdown when there is no fossil fuel activity is allowed. These values will serve the purpose of bassline data of the region and its subregions. The problem of violation of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) norms especially in case of particulate matter, will be resolved by using these background ambient concentrations. At present, due to high soil-dust influence, values of particulate matter are often noticed above prescribed NAAQS levels.11 For example, the 24 hrs NAAQS limit for PM10 is 100 µg/m3 but the average is reported as 251 µg/m3 while that of NAAQS limit is 60 µg/m3 but the recorded average is 129 µg/m3 in the NCR.12 The recorded values are most of the time crossing the prescribed levels because of dusty ambient conditions of the region.13 The dust contributing to fine particles is primarily a mixture of suspended soil, road dust, carbon soot and other particulate matter.14 The natural dust which is prevailing for centuries in this region, is less harmful to the human health. The natural soil-dust is highly rich in CaCO3 in India which has been found a significant scavenger of atmospheric SO2.15-16 According to CPCB, the lockdown has cut of 50% in particulate matter.17 Even after considering the crude figures of half reduction, the `New Normal’ values of PM10 and PM2.5 are higher than the defined in NAAQS. Therefore, slightly higher limit as compared to the present NAAQS values can be defined for particulates.

2. Need Separate Particulate Standards for North India

Since, the influence of crustal dust in northern India is higher than south India due to proximity of Thar desert13,  the particulate standards can be set different for northern states including the Punjab, Delhi, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Gujrat while for other states including hilly and coastal states, a different set of values of PM10 and PM2.5 can be defined primarily based on pandemic baseline values.

3. Need to Include New Pollutants

Some new parameters can be included in the criteria pollutants list for example, Cl2/HCl measurements in most of the urban areas in developing countries can provide the impact on air quality due to plastic burning and pyrolysis factory emissions. Mercury metal is also reported in air18 which can also be included in the list of NAAQSs.  

4. Need to Differentiate Particulate Type
While doing the new exercise, beside reporting mass concentrations, the particulate matter can be reported into three categories e.g. PM2.5(M) for metallic content, PM2.5(C) for its carbon content and PM2.5(O) for its organic content as suggested by Kulshrestha14. This will be helping in providing realistic alert about possible health effects to the citizens. This will also help in controlling the industrial emissions from different sectors after the pandemic is over19. We should not forget that the controlling air pollution is the key to climate change.

References

  1. IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  2. Berman, J. D., & Ebisu, K. (2020). Changes in US air pollution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science of the Total Environment, 139864.
  3. Sharma, S., Zhang, M., Gao, J., Zhang, H., & Kota, S. H. 2020. Effect of restricted emissions during COVID-19 on air quality in India. Science of the Total Environment, 728, 138878.
  4. Singh Y. and Kulshrestha U.C. 2020. Air Quality of NCR Delhi during COVID-19 Pandemic: Changes in PM2.5, NO2 and O3 AQI. Special Issue on COVID-19: Environmental Changes. JNU ENVIS Newsletter, Vol 25(1), pp-27-32.
  5. Kulshrestha U. and Mishra M. 2019. Ozone pollution from urban sources- a case study. Geography and You, 19, 30-35.
  6. Singh Y. and Kulshrestha U. 2020. An Analysis of GRAP Task Force Directions for Improved AQI in Delhi during 2018. Current World Environment, 15, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.15.1.06.
  7. Katoch A. and Kulshrestha U. C. 2020. Countrywide Air Pollution Observations in India during COVID-19 Lockdown Special Issue on COVID-19: Environmental Changes. JNU ENVIS Newsletter, Vol 25(1), pp- 21-26.
  8. Sharma A. and Kulshrestha U.C. 2020. Reduction in Global Air pollution During COVID-19 Lockdown. Special Issue on COVID-19: Environmental Changes. JNU ENVIS Newsletter, Vol 25(1), pp- 2-10.
  9. The Guardian. 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/23/coronavirus-pandemic-leading-to-huge-drop-in-air-pollution, Retrieved on 13/08/2020.
  10. Spectrum. 2020. https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/environment/coronavirus-outbreak-curbing-china-co2-emissions, Retrieved on August 13, 2020.
  11. Manzoor S., Kulshrestha U. 2015. Atmospheric Aerosols: Air Quality and Climate Change Perspectives. Available from: http://www.cwejournal.org/?p=13260.
  12. ARAI, 2020. Source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations of Delhi NCR for identification of major sources. Automotive Research Association of India and TERI report. https://www.teriin.org/sites/default/files/2018-08/AQM-SA_0.pdf, retrieved on August 14, 2020.
  13. Sharma D., Kulshrestha U.C. (2014) Spatial and temporal patterns of air pollutants in rural and urban areas of India. J Environmental Pollution195: 276–281. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.08.026.
  14. Kulshrestha U. 2015. Some Facts about Recent Air Pollution Problem in Delhi. Journal of Indian Geophysical Union, Vol, 19, 351-352.
  15. Kulshrestha, M.J., Kulshrestha, U.C., Parashar, D.C., Vairamani, M., 2003. Estimation of SO4 contribution by dry deposition of SO2 onto the dust particles in India. Atmos. Environ. 37 (22), 3057e3063.
  16. Kulshrestha, U. 2013. Acid Rain: In Encyclopedia of Environmental Management; S.E. Jorgensen, ed. Taylor & Francis: New York, 1: 8-22.
  17. The Hindu, 2020. Lockdown cuts PM2.5, PM10 levels by half in Delhi: CPCB. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/lockdown-cuts-pm25-pm10-levels-by-half-in-delhi-cpcb/article31415389.ece, retrieved on August 14, 2020.
  18. Kumari, A. and Kulshrestha, U. 2018. Trace ambient levels of particulate mercury and its sources at a rural site near Delhi. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 75(4), 335-355.
  19. Kulshrestha U. 2020. Impacts of COVID-19 on Air Pollution and Strategies for Improvement. In COVID-19 & National Lock Down: Impacts & Future Strategies in Agriculture & Environment, Technical Bulletin, Society or Conservation of Nature (SCON), New Delhi, August Special Issue, pp 13-15.