Flood Hazard Vulnerability Assessment by using Geo Spatial Techniques: Krishna & Guntur Districts, Andhra Pradesh

The study on flood hazard vulnerability assessment of Guntur and Krishna district in Andhra Pradesh. The present study has attempted by using the historical flood inundation data (2000-2020) and obtain flood hazard zones usingmulti temporal data sets through remote sensing and GIS. The Krishna floods of 2020 have been used as a case study for ground-truthing verification. Flood Hazard Zonation (FHZ) map was generated after getting flood hazard layers and integrating them in the GIS environment using a multi-criteria overlay analysis approach. The flood hazard zones has been classified into low, moderate and high based on frequency of floods, their spatial extent and number of flooding events occurred in the study area during last 21 years. About 414 villages are identified as low hazard category, 58 villages fall in Moderate and 35 villages are in High flood hazard category in the study area. Minimizing Disaster Risk Reduction,the Government particularly the disaster management authorities shall integrate long-term mitigation strategies based on risk assessment and geospatial technologies for sustainable development and planning.


Introduction
Flood is one of the most devastating natural calamities that affects people all over the world.In recent years, an increasing number of people around the world have been exposed to severe natural disasters, which have disrupted society functioning and resulted in widespread human, economic, and environmental losses.2] The primary causes of floods are geographically diverse distribution of river floodplains and low-lying coastlines, as well as their longstanding attraction for human settlement.Flooding is still a common cause for human loss and damaging property and these are common phenomenon in the world today, affecting millions of people each year.
The urbanization and climate change have increased the recurrence of floods across the globe with significant changes in characteristics of flood recurrence and interval period. 3India's unique geographic setting, climate, topography, and population all contribute to its high risk and vulnerability to floods and these phenomena cannot be prevented.The flood risk assessment plays a key role in Disaster management. 4ne of the key functions of Government, particularly disaster management authorities in floodprone areas is flood management with the goal of ensuring peoples safety and well-being of their environment.For achieving this, Vulnerability reduction and increased resilience are important approaches and one of the most important aspects in this process is identifying vulnerable areas and quantifying vulnerability. 5Increasing methodologies for assessment and our understanding of flood risk vulnerability can help decision-makers for reducing damage and losses.Over the past few decades, various flood vulnerability assessment approaches have been developed.The purpose of flood vulnerability assessment is reduction of losses and damages due to floods.It is not possible to completely avoid risk of flooding, but it is possible to lessen the risk by adopting better mitigation measures and management strategies.
The effective vulnerability assessment methodologies and their applications for hazard mitigation and adaptation strategies are required for policy makers. 6lood vulnerability is an important factor in risk management and flood impact analysis, because the vulnerability is the primary cause of disasters, it seems necessary to enhance our understanding of vulnerability. 7Vulnerability assessment is a difficult task as it is influenced by various environmental, social, economic, and political issues at the local level. 8The physical and social vulnerability assessment studies help us for comprehensive analysis of disaster-prone areas and feasibility of risk reduction strategies. 9Several approaches for assessing flood vulnerability have been developed by researchers, however threats due to floods still prevalent inspite of increased technology and awareness about the vulnerability. 10lti-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) through Geographic Information System (GIS) for assessing and integrating geographical data andto support in decision making. 11Flood vulnerability and flood inundation maps were key factors for flood mitigation and risk management.These maps give us precise geospatial information about flood extent which can be used as planning tools to evaluate landscape vulnerability and flood risk.
The necessity for a review of various flood risk management approaches in order to reduce large-scale losses to life and property has been addressed in the literature.Satellite helps in providing spatial and temporal coverage of floodinundated areas, making them more useful for monitoring offloods.The remote sensing and GIS methodologies provides valuable information for flood hazard assessment.
This study aims to examine the usefulness of geospatial approaches and suggesting an appropriate methodology for flood inundation mapping as well as landscape vulnerability and zonation.Local governments shallbe utilized these maps as a guide in flood management and for taking mitigation measures for reduce the risk of floods and their consequences.

Study Area
The Districts of Krishna and Guntur of Andhra Pradesh, India located between Latitude 15⁰42'5" to 17⁰9'30" Longitude 79⁰11'36" to 81⁰33'30" with a population of 89,82,542 (Krishna -45,17,398,  Guntur-44,65,144).Present study area depicts in  All the flood events (2000-2020) flood layers were extracted from multi-temporal satellite data.The flood layers pertaining to the same year are combined into one inundation layer, representing the maximum inundated area in one year.For the past 21 years, all these flood layers have been combined into a flood hazard layer that represents the observed flooded area with varying frequencies by using ArcGIS 10.8 environment.As a part of the study to identify the ground truthing of vulnerable areas due to floods in the year 2020 has been taken for case study to identify the homogeneous in the flood zonation maps. 13

Results and Discussion Damage Assessment
On account of incessant rains and floods in Krishna River which adversely affected the bio resources, livelihood and capital wealth (Infrastructure).The floods incurred immense losses to the infrastructure, as many roads, bridges and thousands of houses were damaged /inundated.Large quantities of agricultural/Horticulture produce were lost putting the livelihood of farmers at risk.There is huge disruption to public life as several connecting roads were damaged.

Mapping of the Flood Prone Area
The Flood Hazard Zonation (FHZ) map (Figure -5) is generated after getting flood hazard layers and integrated to GIS environment using a multi-criteria overlay analysis approach.It is an essential part for minimizing the risk due to floods.These maps give precise geospatial information on flood inundation and can be used as planning tools to analyze flood hazards and landscape susceptibility.This can be act as a base for prediction, early warning, and evacuation of the community and for relief works and also in turn can have a better control over the post flood works like mitigation measures. 14The flood prone areas has been classified in to low, moderate and high for preparing of flood hazard zonation map based on frequency of floods, (Figure 6) their spatial extent and number of flooding events occurred in that area during last 21 years and the number of villages/habitations category wise statistics are tabulated in

Mitigation Strategies
To minimize the severity of floods and for effective flood management the following mitigation measures to be adopted.

Flood Mitigation Structural Measures
The important structural measures like flood walls, Channel improvement, diversion of flood water, construction of embankments, flood levees and dredging of stream and rivers on a regular basis to avoid floods and to reduce the impact of siltation.
The local government can take up projects to improvise local storm water drain and traditional flood prevention systems, plantation and afforestation throughout the river catchment area to prevent soil erosion with special emphasis with more soil binding capacity such as bamboos and bushy plants etc.

Flood Mitigation Non-Structural Measures
The Non-structural measures like flood plain management plans, flood zonation, improving forecasting and warning systems, awareness generation, developing flood insurance mechanism to the community etc. which can reduce the adverse affects of flood.

Conclusion
Flood Hazard Zonation map is generated through flood hazard layers from 2000-2020 and integrated to GIS environment using a multi-criteria overlay analysis approach.Flood hazard zonation map shows that the areas along Krishna River and low laying area of Krishna and Guntur districts were inundated in most of the flood events.The study reveals that 414 villages have been identified as low hazard category, 58 villages fall in Moderate and 35 villages are in High flood hazard category.It is observed that 21.86% of the total area studied comes under vulnerability phenomenon and also 22.05% of the total population belongs to study area is prone to floods.The study also reveals that most of the flood prone area is covered by agriculture and plantation covered to an extent of 4069.01Sq.km.
Besides the agriculture and plantation the buildup area of about 262.46 Sq.km is prone to floods.
The study has been taken with remote sensing and GIS techniques which helped in arriving the significant results for arriving at flood hazard zone maps in identifying the vulnerability of assessment due to floods in Krishna and Guntur District areas of Andhra Pradesh.

Declaration
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figure 1 .
The total administrative area of Krishna District is 8,727 sq.km with 970 Gram Panchayats covering 53 Mandals.The Guntur District having 1069 Grama panchayats in 57 mandals with 12,805 sq.km of administrative area (Figure -1) Krishna Floods 2020 The massive floods in Krishna River wreaked havoc in the district of Guntur and Krishna of Andhra Pradesh in September & October, 2020 due to Low pressure/Deep depression formed in Bay of Bengal, under its influence heavy rain fall received by the State and upper catchment area of Krishna basin.The floods in the study area occurred in three phases between September to October of 2020.Resulting the inflow of water levels rapidly increased up to 7.79 Lakh cusecs at Prakasam barrage and the water has been released to downstream, on account of this massive flooding in the surrounding habitations of Krishna River has inundated and distressed the normal life.Flood inflow and out flow view from top of the river at prakasam barrage was shown in Figure 2 dated 17th October, 2020.

Table 1 : Losses and Damage assessment of population, Houses, Crop land and infrastructure District Area Population Density Inundated No of Affected No of No of Ha, No of Kms (sq.km) (Persons area villages population houses crop of Roads per (sq.km) affected damaged/ damaged damaged/ sq,km) inundated inundated
(Source: Memorandum on Heavy rains/floods during, 2020, GoAP)

Table 4 : Land Use/ Land Cover Statistics Flood Hazard Zone Class Area in Sq.Km
One of the major concerns in flood hazard mapping is the analysis of an area land use and land cover because this is one feature that not only reflects the area current use and nature of use, but also the significance of that use with respect to the vulnerability aspects.The total flood prone area is 4707.84Sq.kms.Figure7depicts LULC map of flood hazard zones.As per the LULC classification (Table-4) most of the flood prone area is covered by agriculture and plantation, occupied the area of 4069.01sq.Kms.15An area of 262.46 sk.km is covered built-up area and 28.93 sq.km forest and forest plantation.The area under water bodies and wet lands is about 347.44 sk.km.