Reliable Physical Parameters for Determining Fruit/Seed Maturity Timing of Ficus semicordata Buch. in Kumaun Region of Central Himalaya
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.15.2.04
Copy the following to cite this article:
Jyotsna. Tewari A, Shah S, Tamta K. K. Reliable Physical Parameters for Determining Fruit/Seed Maturity Timing of Ficus semicordata Buch. in Kumaun Region of Central Himalaya. Curr World Environ 2020; 15(2).
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.15.2.04Copy the following to cite this URL:
Jyotsna. Tewari A, Shah S, Tamta K. K. Reliable Physical Parameters for Determining Fruit/Seed Maturity Timing of Ficus semicordata Buch. in Kumaun Region of Central Himalaya. Curr World Environ 2020; 15(2). Available from: https://bit.ly/2zFr1F1
Download article (pdf) Citation Manager Publish History
Select type of program for download
Endnote EndNote format (Mac & Win) | |
Reference Manager Ris format (Win only) | |
Procite Ris format (Win only) | |
Medlars Format | |
RefWorks Format RefWorks format (Mac & Win) | |
BibTex Format BibTex format (Mac & Win) |
Article Publishing History
Received: | 03-03-2020 |
---|---|
Accepted: | 23-05-2020 |
Reviewed by: | Cristina Salmeri |
Second Review by: | Nanda A |
Final Approval by: | Dr Gopal Krishan |
Introduction
Ficus semicordata -Ham. ex Sm. (syn. Ficus cunia Buch.-Ham. ex Roxb.) is a multipurpose tree species belonging to the family Moraceae commonly known as Drooping fig, which is a small to medium sized tree up to 15 m tall, with an uneven crown. The leaf blade is frequently elliptic to lance-shaped and leaf margin is entire or coarsely toothed.1 F. semicordata usually evergreen tree. Sometimes leafless in the dry season.2 Flowering occurs between in the month of May-June. It produced the main seed crop in the beginning of rainy season.3 It occurs at the 750-1500 m elevation range in Himalayan region.4 The leafless fruit-bearing branches develop at the base of the trunk and often become stolon like, trailing across the forest floor.5 Young fruits and whole parts of the tree are used as a medicine. It is a potential fodder for goat and cattle.1 The leaves are also used for polishing wood, ropes are made in by the fibre of bark and species is important for agroforestry.6
Seed maturity is often supplemented by recognizable change in colour, size, odour, taste and texture of the fruits and seeds. Maximum seed quality is reached when seeds get maximum dry weight. Though in certain other species seed quality is reached sometime after achieving maximum dry weight.7
Ficus species are grown in different habitats, the seeds were positively photoblastic. The germination of some Ficus species is stimulated by light and inhabited by gloom. Germination is the conversion form of seed to seedling in the life cycle of plants. The regeneration of most of the wild edible and multipurpose species is poor in their natural habitats mainly due to intense biotic pressure on them.8 To synchronize the artificial regeneration of this important trees species an exact knowledge of maturity time is essential to avoid collection of immature and non-viable seeds.9 Collection of forest fruits and seeds are greatly helped by reliable guidelines of maturity that allow earliest possible collection. In many Himalayan species seed maturation has been related to physical parameters but there is scanty information on seed maturation of F. semicordata. The objective of present study was to evaluate the exact time of fruit/ seed maturation and germination behaviour of F. semicordata.
Material and Methods
Study Site
The study area lies between 29°18ʹ N latitude and 79°30ʹ E longitude. The study was carried out in Nainital district during two consecutive years 2017 and 2018. After a thorough survey 3 sites were selected between 1100 and 1622m elevation on north-western aspect. Bombax ceiba, Eucalyptus species, Pinus roxburghii, Cinnamomum tamala, Celtis iguancea and Ficus hispida were common associated species across all the sites. Climate of study sites is subtropical monsoon type with high temperature towards lower elevation and lower temperature towards high elevation. Annual rainfall was 1679.31-1570.34 mm during 2017-2018, of which nearly 85% occurred during the monsoon period (June to Sep). In both years June was the warmest month and January the coldest one, with temperature varied between 9 and 25º C.10
Table 1: Description of study sites of F. semicordata (Abbreviation- NW = Northwest, SI, SII, SIII = sites).
S No. |
Sites |
Altitude |
Coordinates |
Aspect |
Associated species |
Density (ind./ha) |
1 |
S I |
1622 m |
29º 20’ N, 79º 26’ E |
NW |
Pinus roxburghii, Ficus clavata, F. roxburghii |
156 |
2 |
S II |
1100 m |
29º 19’N 79º 29’ E |
NW |
Eucalyptus species, Pinus roxburghii, Bombax ceiba |
133 |
3 |
S III |
1250m |
29º 23’N 79º 29’ E |
NW |
Celtis iguancea, Cinnamomum tamala, Bombax ceiba, Ficus hispida |
122 |
Vegetational Parameters
The vegetation analysis was made by placing 10 quadrates of 10 sqm across each site. The density of trees, saplings and seedlings were calculated following.11
Tree Characteristics
Five average sized healthy trees were selected and marked at a distance of about 100m from each other at each site. The tree height was measured with Ravi multimeter and tree circumference at breast height (CBH) was measured with a meter tape. The mean tree height ranged between 6.78±1.02 and 14±1.42 m. The mean CBH ranged between 65.71±5.24 and 1.21±9.33 cm.
Maturity Indices
Fruits were collected at 1-week intervals directly from the marked trees. Fruits of all trees at one collection date were mixed and a composite sample was made. From the composite sample three replicates of 25 fruits/seeds were taken for determining different physical characters of fruits/seeds (colour, size, fresh weight). Fruit and seed weight (100 fruits/seeds) was measured using electronic balance (Model No. PGB 301 accuracy + 0.001mg Wensar), Length and width of fruits and seeds were measured by digital Vernier calliper (Model No. CD-6” accuracy + 0.02mm Mitutoyo Co.). Moisture content percentage was calculated for each collection using three replicates of 25 fruit/seed, and estimated on fresh weight basis by drying at 103±2º C for 16±1 hr , then each sample was reweighted following.12
Germination
For germination 4 replicates of 100 seeds were kept at the top of germination paper in petri-dishes at room temperature. During the study period the daily room temperature ranged between 10°C and 28°C. Germination was recorded when the radicle began to appear and monitored for 40 days. Germination percentage was calculated following.13 The data were statically analysed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to determine difference in fruit/seed characteristics, moisture content and germination.14
Results and Discussion
Vegetational Analysis
In the study area the distribution of F. semicordata was found along village paths associated with Pinus roxburghii, Euclayptus species and Bombax ceiba. Across all the sites the tree density of F.semicordata ranged from 122 to 156 ind/ha. The maximum density 156 ind/ha was in site one (SI) (Table 1). The sapling density of the species varied between 44 and 56 ind/ha and seedling density ranged from 33 to 44 ind/ha.
Fruit/Seed Characteristics
Across all the sites the fruit colour was green at first collection during II week of May and gradually turned to pinkish-brown at final collection during last week of June (Tables 2, 3). The seeds were immature during the first and second collection in both the years.
Fruit and Seed Size
In Yr1, across all the sites and dates of collection the average fruit length varies between 13.37±0.04mm (S II) and 19.18±0.03mm (S III) and the fruit width ranged between 14.22±0.06mm (S II) and 20.60±0.17 (S III). The average seed length varies between 1.00±0.03mm (S III) and 1.63±0.07mm (S III) and the seed width ranged between 0.83±0.03mm (S III) and 1.11±0.03mm (S II) (Table 2).
In Yr 2, across all sites and dates of collection the average fruit length varies between 11.46±0.19mm (S III) and 20.44±0.47mm (S III) and the fruit width ranged between 11.82±0.16mm (S III) and 25.90±0.015 (S II). The average seed length varies between 1.21±0.08mm (S III) and 2.23±0.03mm (S I) and the seed width ranged between 1.03±0.03mm (S III) and 1.54±0.09mm (S III) (Table 3). ANOVA showed that the fruit size varied significantly across the dates, sites and years (P<0.05). The seed size varied significantly across the sites and years (P<0.05). The interactions between year × date, year × site, date × site were significant for both fruit and seed size (P< 0.05) (Table 4).
Fruit and Seed Weight
In Yr 1 across all sites and dates the weight of 100 fruits ranged between 181.92 ± 1.34 to 399.00 ± 2.65 g and weight of 100 seeds 0.05±0.003 to 0.18± 0.01 g (Table 2). In Yr-2 the weight of 100 fruits ranged from 123.37 ± 0.68 to 522.02 ± 1.52g and weight of 100 seeds from 0.05± 0.01 to 0.36 ± 0.02 g (Table 3). ANOVA showed that the weight of fruit varied significant across dates, sites, and years (P<0.05). The seed weight varied significantly across the dates and sites (P<0.05). The interaction between year× date, year × site, date× site, year × date × site was significant for both fruit and seed weight (P< 0.05) (Table 4).
Number of Fruit and Seeds per 100 g
In Yr-1 the number of fruits in 100 g varied between 20.00 ± 1.15 and 83.33 ±3.33 and the number of seeds in 100g varied from 79,410.00 ± 5.77 to 82,117.00 ± 3.61 (Table 2). In Yr-2 the number of fruits per 100g ranged from 20.67 ±0.67 to 108.33 ± 1.20 and the seeds per 100g varied between 67,902.00 ± 2.00 to 97,420.67 ± 4.67 (Table3). The number of fruits/seeds in 100 g decreased as the fruit/ seed size and weight increased. ANOVA showed that the number of fruits and seeds in 100 g varied significantly across the dates and years (P<0.05). The interaction between year× date, year × site, date× site, year × date × site were significant for both fruit and seed (P< 0.05) (Table 4).
Fruit and Seed Moisture Content
In Yr 1 across all the sites during first collection the fruit moisture content ranged between 81.17±0.59% and 83.55±1.94%. The fruit moisture content decline gradually with each collection at reached to 50.25±0.57% and 56.54±0.88 at final collection. In all the sites the seeds were immature during the first collection. The moisture content of seeds at second collection ranged between 67.67±3.03% and 68.64±2.57% and at final collection the seed moisture content varied between 40.34±0.74% and 46.91±1.22% (Table 2). In Yr 2 across all the sites during first collection the fruit moisture content ranged between 79.44±1.53% and 82.78±1.63%. The fruit moisture content decline gradually with each collection at reached to 50.35±0.94% and 53.18±1.60% at final collection. In SI and SII sites the seeds were immature during the first collection and in SIII site the seeds of first two collection were immature. The initial moisture content of seeds ranged between 67.67±3.04% and 70.84±1.31% and at final collection the seed moisture content varied between 44.67±0.36% and 52.51±0.95% (Table 3). ANOVA showed that the fruit and seed moisture content percent varied significant across dates, sites and years (P<0.05). The interaction between year × site was significant P<0.05) (Table 4).
Germination Percent
In Yr1 at SI and SIII sites the germination started from the third collection and in S II site from second collection. The initial germination ranged between 0.25±0.006 and 12.25±0.102%. The germination percentage increases with each collection and was maximum during the last collection. The maximum germination ranged between 48.00±0.06 and 56.02±0.50% (Table 2). In Yr 2 due to immature seeds the germination started from third collection in SI and SIII site and from second collection in SII site. The initial germination ranged between 1.05±0.15 and 16.75±1.9%. In Yr 2 also the maximum germination was during the last collection and was 65.57±2.20 and 85.00±4.60% (Table3). ANOVA showed germination percent varied significantly across the sites, dates and years (P<0.05) (Table 4).
Like all other Ficus species, F. Semicordata is an overexploited tree species due to its medicinal uses in 16 states of India.15 The poor natural regeneration of most of the Ficus species has been reported in many studies though the regeneration of F. semicordota is comparatively better than the other species.16-11 But still the species requires attention for the future multiplication.
Physical characteristics of fruits/ seeds have played significant role in determining the indices of seed maturity. Distinct colour change have been associated with seed maturityin many hardwoodspecies.The fruit maturation of F.semicordata became apparent with the change in its colour from green to pinkish brown. Maximum germination occurred when the colour of fruit of F. semicordata turned to pinkish brown. Colour turned out to be a reliable indicator of maturity in many wild edible species like Myrica esculnta, Prunus cerasoides, Bauhinia retusa and Pyracantha crenulata.17-18-19-20
Moisture plays a critical role throughout the life of seeds, change in fruit and seed moisture content are strong manifestations that ripeness is progressing.21 Decline in moisture content from maturing seeds is closely related to seed maturity.22 In F. semicordata also decline in moisture content was a good indicator of maturity. The seed matured when fruit moisture content ranged between 50.25±0.58% and 62.73±2.30% coincided with maximum germination (48.0±0.06% and 85± 4.61%). Similar results were also observed in other species of Ficus namely F. lundellii, F. microcarpa and F. krishnae.23-24-25 Casuarina equisetifolia also attain seed maturity when moisture content is below 50%.26
F. semicordata fruits/seeds attained maturity in the last week of June which is similar to the other species of Ficus like Ficus trigona, Ficus bolivia, Ficus auriculata, Ficus hispida. 27-5
Table 2: Changes in physical fruit and seed characteristics and germination in F. semicordata across different collection dates YR-1 (Abbreviation – Im = Seeds were immature inside the fruit, G = Green, YB = Yellowish brown, PB = Pinkish brown)
Site |
Collection date |
Fruit characteristics |
Seed Characteristics |
||||||||||
Fruit colour |
Fruit Size (mm) |
Weight of 100 fruits (g) |
Number of fruit in 100g |
Moisture Content (%) |
Seed Size (mm) |
Weight of 100 seeds (g) |
Number of seeds in 100 (g) |
Moisture content (%) |
Germi- |
||||
Length |
Width |
Length |
Width |
||||||||||
YR -1 |
|||||||||||||
S1 |
14-05-17 |
G |
13.96 ± 0.22 |
14.31 ± 0.12 |
186.03 ± 8.26 |
66.67 ± 6.67 |
83.55 ± 1.94 |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
21-05-17 |
G |
15.53 ± 0.24 |
16.20 ± 0.05 |
188.47 ± 5.32 |
60.00 ± 5.77 |
75.47 ± 1.86 |
0.69 ± 0.003 |
0.69 ± 0.003 |
0.05 ± 0.003 |
81907.00 ± 3.51 |
67.67 ± 3.03 |
0.00 ± 0.00 |
|
28-05-17 |
G |
15.53 ± 0.25 |
16.45 ± 0.10 |
217.67 ± 2.61 |
46.67 ± 3.33 |
71.35 ± 3.43 |
1.17 ± 0.01 |
0.84 ± 0.02 |
0.07 ± 0.02 |
82413.33 ± 8.82 |
62.29 ± 2.46 |
6.02 ± 0.06 |
|
04-06-17 |
G |
16.46 ± 0.14 |
17.14 ± 0.02 |
300.43 ± 5.93 |
43.33 ± 3.33 |
69.29 ± 2.46 |
1.12 ± 0.04 |
0.94 ± 0.02 |
0.08 ± 0.02 |
83907.00 ± 3.51 |
61.12 ± 0.81 |
31.00 ± 0.11 |
|
11-06-17 |
YB |
16.88 ± 0.06 |
17.78 ± 0.22 |
336.33 ± 4.26 |
33.33 ± 3.33 |
66.55 ± 0.88 |
1.16 ± 0.10 |
0.93 ± 0.04 |
0.12 ± 0.01 |
81518.67 ± 4.37 |
60.03 ± 0.75 |
35.75 ± 0.31 |
|
18-06-17 |
YB |
17.07 ± 0.04 |
18.13 ± 0.24 |
339.67 ± 1.86 |
26.67 ± 3.33 |
60.94 ± 0.71 |
1.13 ± 0.15 |
0.94 ± 0.11 |
0.13 ± 0.01 |
80226.67 ± 8.82 |
52.92 ± 0.37 |
46.00 ± 0.49 |
|
25-06-17 |
PB |
18.10 ± 0.00 |
19.08 ± 0.02 |
356.00 ± 2.08 |
23.33 ± 3.33 |
56.54 ± 0.88 |
1.26 ± 0.03 |
1.04 ± 0.05 |
0.18 ± 0.01 |
79410.00 ± 5.78 |
46.90 ± 0.66 |
56.02 ± 0.50 |
|
S2 |
14-05-17 |
G |
13.37 ± 0.04 |
14.22 ± 0.06 |
183.27 ± 2.13 |
83.33 ± 3.33 |
81.17 ± 0.59 |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
21-05-17 |
G |
14.14 ± 0.01 |
15.56 ± 0.10 |
184.01 ± 5.52 |
70.00 ± 5.77 |
77.92 ± 0.54 |
0.94 ± 0.09 |
0.57 ± 0.04 |
0.09 ± 0.01 |
82117.00 ± 3.61 |
68.64 ± 2.57 |
12.25 ± 0.10 |
|
28-05-17 |
G |
14.67 ± 0.04 |
16.00 ± 0.001 |
186.70 ± 3.72 |
63.33 ± 3.33 |
75.19 ± 0.55 |
0.70 ± 0.02 |
0.81 ± 0.04 |
0.11 ± 0.01 |
82442.67 ± 1.45 |
68.36 ± 2.36 |
29.75 ± 0.49 |
|
04-06-17 |
G |
16.85 ± 0.07 |
17.25 ± 0.05 |
292.04 ± 1.53 |
53.33 ± 3.33 |
68.62 ± 1.22 |
0.86 ± 0.03 |
0.76 ± 0.03 |
0.13 ± 0.01 |
83722.33 ± 1.45 |
66.95 ± 0.84 |
40.25 ± 0.16 |
|
11-06-17 |
YB |
18.17 ± 0.03 |
19.48 ± 0.23 |
354.39 ± 2.02 |
36.67 ± 3.33 |
62.53 ± 1.45 |
0.90 ± 0.01 |
0.82 ± 0.02 |
0.14 ± 0.01 |
84350.33 ± 0.89 |
54.67 ± 0.55 |
41.75 ± 0.92 |
|
18-06-17 |
YB |
18.35 ± 0.09 |
19.92 ± 0.07 |
366.84 ± 1.49 |
33.33 ± 3.33 |
55.23 ± 2.63 |
1.09 ± 0.04 |
0.93 ± 0.04 |
0.17 ± 0.01 |
81114.00 ± 1.53 |
40.45 ± 0.46 |
44.00 ± 0.58 |
|
25-06-17 |
PB |
18.25 ± 0.12 |
20.63 ± 0.06 |
379.13 ± 2.13 |
26.67 ± 3.33 |
50.25 ± 0.58 |
1.14 ± 0.06 |
1.11 ± 0.04 |
0.18 ± 0.01 |
80802.67 ± 1.77 |
40.34 ± 0.74 |
48.00 ± 0.06 |
|
S3 |
14-05-17 |
G |
13.46 ± 0.08 |
14.68 ± 0.01 |
181.92 ± 1.34 |
76.67 ± 3.33 |
82.78 ± 1.63 |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
21-05-17 |
G |
14.68 ± 0.07 |
14.82 ± 0.03 |
182.77 ± 7.16 |
66.67 ± 3.33 |
85.48 ± 0.21 |
1.00 ± 0.04 |
0.83 ± 0.03 |
0.09 ± 0.01 |
81802.67 ± 1.77 |
67.99 ± 0.750 |
0.00 ± 0.00 |
|
28-05-17 |
G |
15.15 ± 0.13 |
15.52 ± 0.19 |
190.71 ± 3.35 |
56.67 ± 3.33 |
84.72 ± 0.33 |
1.12 ± 0.02 |
0.82 ± 0.03 |
0.09 ± 0.003 |
81304.67 ± 2.19 |
67.94 ± 0.33 |
0.25 ± 0.01 |
|
04-06-17 |
G |
16.57 ± 0.24 |
16.46 ± 0.14 |
290.64 ± 1.93 |
46.67 ± 3.33 |
75.63 ± 0.83 |
1.31 ± 0.11 |
0.75 ± 0.04 |
0.11 ± 0.01 |
81106.00 ± 2.31 |
63.30 ± 1.68 |
4.05 ± 0.07 |
|
11-06-17 |
YB |
17.50 ± 0.27 |
17.70 ± 0.09 |
317.76 ± 6.18 |
43.33 ± 3.33 |
71.23 ± 0.59 |
1.09 ± 0.04 |
0.93 ± 0.03 |
0.12 ± 0.01 |
80505.00 ± 2.65 |
61.55 ± 1.33 |
36.05 ± 0.03 |
|
18-06-17 |
YB |
18.40 ± 0.15 |
19.73 ± 0.29 |
367.17 ± 6.87 |
26.67 ± 3.33 |
62.73 ± 2.30 |
1.22 ± 0.09 |
0.89 ± 0.08 |
0.17 ± 0.01 |
80216.33 ± 2.96 |
58.55 ± 0.88 |
54.00 ± 0.58 |
|
25-06-17 |
PB |
19.18 ± 0.03 |
20.60 ± 0.17 |
399.00 ± 2.65 |
20.00 ± 1.16 |
54.37 ± 1.39 |
1.63 ± 0.07 |
1.07 ± 0.04 |
0.18 ± 0.01 |
79710.67 ± 0.89 |
46.91 ± 1.22 |
53.25 ± 0.25 |
Table 3: Changes in physical fruit and seed characteristics and germination in F. semicordata across different collection dates YR-2 (Abbreviation – Im = Seeds were immature inside the fruit, G = Green, YB = Yellowish brown, PB = Pinkish brown)
Site |
Collection |
Fruit Colour |
Fruit Characteristics |
Seed Characteristics |
|||||||||
Fruit Size(mm) |
Weight of 100 fruits (g) |
Number of fruit in 100g |
Moisture Content (%) |
Seed Size (mm) |
Weight of 100 seeds (g) |
Number of seeds in 100 (g) |
Moisture content (%) |
Germi- |
|||||
Length |
Width |
|
Length |
Width |
|||||||||
S1 |
14-05-18 |
G |
12.80 ± 0.09 |
13.94 ± 0.03 |
158.42 ± 0.70 |
108.33 ± 1.20 |
79.44 ± 1.53 |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
|
21-05-18 |
G |
13.10 ± 0.15 |
14.11 ± 0.11 |
179.70 ± 2.30 |
93.33 ± 1.76 |
75.47 ± 1.86 |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
|
28-05-18 |
G |
14.29 ± 0.19 |
15.20 ± 0.41 |
234.42 ± 6.06 |
73.33 ± 3.33 |
71.35 ± 3.43 |
1.33 ± 0.06 |
1.12 ± 0.07 |
0.05 ± 0.01 |
97420.67 ± 4.67 |
67.67 ± 3.04 |
1.75 ± 0.10 |
|
04-06-18 |
G |
16.52 ± 0.05 |
17.92 ± 0.58 |
315.29 ± 0.53 |
46.67 ± 3.33 |
68.35 ± 1.19 |
1.54 ± 0.12 |
1.24 ± 0.01 |
0.09 ± 0.003 |
81655.33 ± 1.45 |
62.29 ± 2.45 |
26.75 ± 0.53 |
|
11-06-18 |
YB |
17.37 ± 0.11 |
19.34 ± 0.39 |
353.08 ± 1.94 |
36.67 ± 3.33 |
64.15 ± 2.30 |
1.63 ± 0.17 |
1.24 ± 0.08 |
0.10 ± 0.003 |
80314.67 ± 3.71 |
59.58 ± 0.54 |
48.00 ± 0.57 |
|
18-06-18 |
YB |
19.64 ± 0.29 |
24.88 ± 0.30 |
495.08 ± 2.85 |
26.67 ± 3.33 |
57.49 ± 1.90 |
1.70 ± 0.08 |
1.31 ± 0.08 |
0.11 ± 0.003 |
75412.67 ± 1.76 |
52.78 ± 0.47 |
50.75 ± 1.76 |
|
25-06-18 |
PB |
19.66 ± 0.02 |
25.00 ± 0.39 |
510.28 ± 3.60 |
28.33 ± 1.20 |
53.18 ± 1.61 |
2.23 ± 0.03 |
1.43 ± 0.05 |
0.15 ± 0.003 |
73602.33 ± 1.45 |
48.15 ± 0.52 |
65.57 ± 2.20 |
|
S2 |
14-05-18 |
G |
13.12 ± 0.17 |
13.65 ± 0.07 |
164.98 ± 2.01 |
94.67 ± 0.88 |
81.17 ± 0.59 |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
21-05-18 |
G |
14.43 ± 0.05 |
15.41 ± 0.05 |
169.37 ± 1.39 |
82.00 ± 1.53 |
77.92 ± 0.54 |
1.26 ± 0.03 |
1.16 ± 0.01 |
0.09 ± 0.003 |
97003.67 ± 1.86 |
68.64 ± 2.57 |
1.05 ± 0.15 |
|
28-05-18 |
G |
16.70 ± 0.01 |
18.20 ± 0.04 |
318.17 ± 3.22 |
65.33 ± 2.91 |
74.48 ± 1.27 |
1.56 ± 0.01 |
1.16 ± 0.05 |
0.10 ± 0.003 |
96105.00 ± 2.89 |
66.95 ± 0.84 |
13.25 ± 0.32 |
|
04-06-18 |
G |
18.11 ± 0.00 |
19.67 ± 0.21 |
374.45 ± 3.05 |
52.00 ± 1.53 |
71.48 ± 1.47 |
1.55 ± 0.03 |
1.25 ± 0.06 |
0.13 ± 0.006 |
92716.33 ± 2.96 |
63.99 ± 1.19 |
27.05 ± 1.81 |
|
11-06-18 |
YB |
18.34 ± 0.27 |
19.56 ± 0.26 |
382.06 ± 1.20 |
45.00 ± 2.65 |
66.28 ± 2.11 |
1.81 ± 0.16 |
1.22 ± 0.05 |
0.13 ± 0.006 |
84103.33 ± 2.85 |
60.31 ± 5.74 |
51.08 ± 0.44 |
|
18-06-18 |
YB |
19.79 ± 0.05 |
25.63 ± 0.20 |
510.70 ± 2.99 |
31.67 ± 1.67 |
56.67 ± 2.77 |
2.05 ± 0.08 |
1.39 ± 0.01 |
0.14 ± 0.007 |
75510.33 ± 0.88 |
59.20 ± 1.48 |
76.92 ± 1.90 |
|
25-06-18 |
PB |
19.96 ± 0.07 |
25.90 ± 0.05 |
522.02 ± 1.52 |
24.33 ± 2.96 |
50.35 ± 0.94 |
2.19 ± 0.11 |
1.54 ± 0.08 |
0.15 ± 0.006 |
67902.00 ± 2.00 |
44.67 ± 0.35 |
83.05 ± 1.67 |
|
S3 |
14-05-18 |
G |
11.46 ± 0.19 |
11.82 ± 0.16 |
123.37 ± 0.68 |
102.33 ± 1.86 |
82.78 ± 1.63 |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
21-05-18 |
G |
11.92 ± 0.26 |
12.50 ± 0.15 |
132.27 ± 0.64 |
93.33 ± 3.28 |
81.08 ± 0.52 |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
Im |
|
28-05-18 |
G |
16.50 ± 0.21 |
18.34 ± 0.31 |
310.53 ± 3.91 |
70.67 ± 5.36 |
78.63 ± 1.31 |
1.21 ± 0.08 |
1.03 ± 0.03 |
0.09 ± 0.01 |
87322.67 ± 1.20 |
70.84 ± 1.32 |
16.75 ± 1.92 |
|
04-06-18 |
G |
19.05 ± 0.03 |
19.57 ± 0.10 |
391.87 ± 2.54 |
63.67 ± 2.91 |
73.15 ± 1.54 |
1.63 ± 0.02 |
1.13 ± 0.03 |
0.12 ± 0.01 |
86704.67 ± 2.60 |
63.30 ± 1.68 |
46.75 ± 5.01 |
|
11-06-18 |
YB |
19.28 ± 0.07 |
20.26 ± 0.07 |
423.58 ± 6.50 |
56.00 ± 1.73 |
68.13 ± 1.06 |
1.84 ± 0.11 |
1.29 ± 0.09 |
0.13 ± 0.01 |
79753.67 ± 1.86 |
61.94 ± 2.18 |
56.48 ± 1.84 |
|
18-06-18 |
YB |
20.84 ± 0.07 |
23.44 ± 0.27 |
512.60 ± 4.30 |
33.67 ± 1.86 |
54.15 ± 0.63 |
1.96 ± 0.06 |
1.31 ± 0.07 |
0.15 ± 0.01 |
75125.33 ± 1.76 |
55.92 ± 1.81 |
84.75 ± 2.07 |
|
25-06-18 |
PB |
20.44 ± 0.47 |
24.78 ± 0.55 |
515.15 ± 0.65 |
20.67 ± 0.67 |
52.16 ± 0.57 |
2.06 ± 0.04 |
1.54 ± 0.09 |
0.36 ± 0.01 |
68009.00 ± 4.58 |
52.51 ± 0.95 |
85.00 ± 4.61 |
Table 4: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for different fruit and seed parameters across different collection dates, sites and years
Characters |
Source |
Type III Sum of Square |
df |
Mean Square |
F-Value |
Fruit Length (mm) |
Year |
8.711 |
1 |
8.711 |
114.346 ** |
Site |
7.869 |
2 |
3.934 |
51.644 ** |
|
Date |
649.141 |
6 |
108.190 |
1.420 ** |
|
Year × Site |
5.198 |
2 |
2.599 |
34.114 ** |
|
Year × Date |
52.704 |
6 |
8.784 |
115.304 ** |
|
Site ×Date |
21.092 |
12 |
1.758 |
23.072 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
22.267 |
12 |
1.856 |
24.358 ** |
|
Fruit width (mm) |
Year |
100.125 |
1 |
100.125 |
700.076 ** |
Site |
18.018 |
2 |
9.009 |
62.990 ** |
|
Date |
1234.901 |
6 |
205.817 |
1.439 ** |
|
Year × Site |
1.951 |
2 |
.976 |
6.822 ** |
|
Year × Date |
202.050 |
6 |
33.675 |
235.455 ** |
|
Site ×Date |
17.505 |
12 |
1.459 |
10.200 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
40.968 |
12 |
3.414 |
23.870 ** |
|
Weight of 100 Fruits (g) |
Year |
8020.379 |
1 |
8020.379 |
176.231 ** |
Site |
769.834 |
2 |
384.917 |
8.458 ** |
|
Date |
2012197.933 |
6 |
335366.322 |
7.369 ** |
|
Year × Site |
21445.400 |
2 |
10722.700 |
235.609 ** |
|
Year × Date |
39510.083 |
6 |
6585.014 |
144.692 ** |
|
Site ×Date |
33042.826 |
12 |
2753.569 |
60.504 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
19937.341 |
12 |
1661.445 |
36.507 ** |
|
Number of Fruits in 100g |
Year |
4299.175 |
1 |
4299.175 |
136.413 ** |
Site |
473.190 |
2 |
236.595 |
7.507 ** |
|
Date |
62666.937 |
6 |
10444.489 |
331.404 ** |
|
Year × Site |
928.111 |
2 |
464.056 |
14.725 ** |
|
Year × Date |
2793.603 |
6 |
465.601 |
14.774 ** |
|
Site ×Date |
868.921 |
12 |
72.410 |
2.298 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
1018.444 |
12 |
84.870 |
2.693 ** |
|
Fruit Moisture Content % |
Year |
81.008 |
1 |
81.008 |
11.232 ** |
Site |
446.844 |
2 |
223.422 |
30.977 ** |
|
Date |
12722.779 |
6 |
2120.463 |
293.998 ** |
|
Year × Site |
129.019 |
2 |
64.509 |
8.944 ** |
|
Year × Date |
32.888 |
6 |
5.481 |
.760 NS |
|
Site ×Date |
381.147 |
12 |
31.762 |
4.404 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
90.481 |
12 |
7.540 |
1.045 NS |
|
Seed Length (mm) |
Year |
4.613 |
1 |
4.613 |
320.236 ** |
Site |
.172 |
2 |
.086 |
5.967 ** |
|
Date |
39.034 |
6 |
6.506 |
451.585 ** |
|
Year × Site |
1.493 |
2 |
.746 |
51.804 ** |
|
Year × Date |
5.833 |
6 |
.972 |
67.477 ** |
|
Site ×Date |
2.258 |
12 |
.188 |
13.063 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
1.218 |
12 |
.102 |
7.046 ** |
|
Seed Width (mm) |
Year |
1.580 |
1 |
1.580 |
239.986 ** |
Site |
.161 |
2 |
.080 |
12.212 ** |
|
Date |
21.175 |
6 |
3.529 |
536.007 ** |
|
Year × Site |
.427 |
2 |
.213 |
32.422 ** |
|
Year × Date |
2.081 |
6 |
.347 |
52.676 ** |
|
Site ×Date |
.954 |
12 |
.080 |
12.078 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
1.448 |
12 |
.121 |
18.324 ** |
|
Weight of 100 Seeds (g) |
Year |
.001 |
1 |
.001 |
4.188 ** |
Site |
.031 |
2 |
.016 |
75.465 ** |
|
Date |
.447 |
6 |
.075 |
361.200 ** |
|
Year × Site |
.005 |
2 |
.003 |
12.496 ** |
|
Year × Date |
.020 |
6 |
.003 |
16.421 ** |
|
Site ×Date |
.050 |
12 |
.004 |
20.125 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
.043 |
12 |
.004 |
17.311 ** |
|
Number of Seeds in 100g |
Year |
1.608 |
1 |
1.608 |
2.498 ** |
Site |
2.023 |
2 |
1.011 |
1.571 ** |
|
Date |
1.033 |
6 |
1.722 |
2.676 ** |
|
Year × Site |
1.527 |
2 |
7.635 |
1.186 ** |
|
Year × Date |
1.072 |
6 |
1.787 |
2.777 ** |
|
Site ×Date |
7.732 |
12 |
6.444 |
1.001 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
8.047 |
12 |
6.706 |
1.042 ** |
|
Seed Moisture Content % |
Year |
798.186 |
1 |
798.186 |
97.594 ** |
Site |
336.968 |
2 |
168.484 |
20.601 ** |
|
Date |
56599.376 |
6 |
9433.229 |
1.153 ** |
|
Year × Site |
1141.845 |
2 |
570.922 |
69.807 ** |
|
Year × Date |
7532.546 |
6 |
1255.424 |
153.501 ** |
|
Site ×Date |
5657.732 |
12 |
471.478 |
57.648 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
3628.854 |
12 |
302.404 |
36.975 ** |
|
Germination % |
Year |
2759.234 |
1 |
2759.234 |
490.398 ** |
Site |
1141.568 |
2 |
570.784 |
101.445 ** |
|
Date |
77967.463 |
6 |
12994.577 |
2.310 ** |
|
Year × Site |
1922.280 |
2 |
961.140 |
170.823 ** |
|
Year × Date |
3832.931 |
6 |
638.822 |
113.538 ** |
|
Site ×Date |
1881.255 |
12 |
156.771 |
27.863 ** |
|
Year × Site × Date |
3265.532 |
12 |
272.128 |
48.365 ** |
Conclusion
From the present study it was evident that the change in fruit colour from green to pinkish brown appears to be a useful parameter for determining proper time of seed collection. In addition, moisture content of fruits and seeds is also a valuable parameter to infer the maturity stage and germination capability. The parameters can be used for collecting mature fruits/ seeds and avoiding large scale nursery and plantation failures due to immature fruits/seeds of the species.
Acknowledgment
Authors are thankful to Head of the Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, D. S. B. Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital for providing the laboratory facilities.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest.
References
- Kaur V, Kumar T, Upadhyaya K. An overview on the phytomedicinal approaches of Ficus semicordata. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016; 5 (4): 606-616.
- Troup R. S. The silviculture of Indian Trees Vol III, Oxford at the clarendon press 1921: 1-1195.
- Blakesley D, Elliot S, Kuarak C, Navakitbumrung P, Zangkum S, Anusarnunthorn V. Propagating framework tree species to restore seasonally dry tropical forest: Implications of seasonal seed dispersal and dormancy. Forest Ecology And Management. 2002;164: 31-38.
- Sharma N, Behera M. D, Das A. P, Panda R. M. Plant richness pattern in an elevation gradient in the eastern Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01699-7
- Kuaraksa C, Elliott S, Martine H.M. The phenology of dioecious Ficus spp. Tree species and it’s important for forest restoration projects. Forest Ecology and Management. 2012;261 (1): 87-93.
- Pramanick D. D. A Synoptic Account of the Family Moraceae in Uttarakhand. Journal of Applied Forest Ecology 2017; 5 (1):17-26
- Singh R.P, Tewari A, Shah S, Tewari B. Seed maturity indices in Aisandra butyracea- A multipurpose tree species of lower Himalaya. Journal of Environmental Biology. 2010; 31 (6): 297-299
- Sundariyal M, Sundariyal R. C. Seed germination and response of stem cutting to hormonal treatment in six priority wild edible fruit species of Sikkim Himalaya. Indian Forester. 2001; 127 (6): 695-705
- Willan, R.L. A guide to Forest seed handling with special reference to the tropics. FAO Forestry Paper 20/2 FAO, Rome. 1985:1-379
- World Weather online. Available at https://www.worldweatheronline.com/lang/en- in/nainital-weather-averages/uttarakhand/in.aspx Accessed 2019 March.
- Malik Z.A, Bhatt A.B. Regeneration status of tree species and survival of their seedlings in Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary and its adjoining areas in Western Himalaya, India. International Society for Tropical Ecology. 2016; 57 (4): 677-690.
- International Seed Testing Association. Moisture content and equipment Wkg Group. In: Report of the Forest Tree Seed Committee. Seed Science and Technology. 1981; 9(1): 1977-1980.
- Shah S, Tewari A. Limited impact of climate change on seed maturation time in Myrica esculenta Buch-Ham. Ex. D.Don in Himalayan region. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology. 2016; 1 (4): 713-717.
- Snedecor G.W, Cochran W.G. Statistical methods. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi 593 1967: 381-418.
- Gupta S, Acharya R. Ethno medicinal claims of Ficus semicordata Buch.-Ham. ex Sm. A review. International Journal of Green Pharmacy. 2018; 12 (1): 206-213.
- Omeja P, Obua J, Cunningham A. B. Regeneration, density and size class distribution of tree species used for drum making in Central Uganda. African Journal of Ecology. 2004; 42: 129- 136.
- Shah S, Tewari A, Tewari B, Singh R. P. Seed maturation indicators in Myrica esculenta Buch-Ham.EX. D. Don- A multipurpose tree species of subtropical- temperate Himalayan Region. New Forest. 2010; 40: 9-18.
- Tewari B, Tewari A, Shah S, Pande N, Singh R.P. Physical attributes as indicator of seed maturity and germination enhancement in Himalayan Wild Cherry (Prunus cerasoides D.Don.). New Forests. 2011; 41: 139-146.
- Upadhayay L, Singh R. P, Tewari A, Bisht S, Shah S. Seed maturation indicators in Bauhinia retusa HAM in Kumaun Central Himalayas. Indian Journal of Forestry. 2006; 29(4): 367-371.
- Shah S, Tewari B, Bisht S, Tewari A. Seed maturation indicator in Pyracantha crenulata Roxb. New Forest. 2006; 32: 1-7.
- Rediske J. H. Maturation of Douglas- Fir seed: A biochemical study. Forest Science. 1961; 7: 204-213.
- Adam C. A, Rinnie R. W. Seed maturation in soyabean (Glycine max L. Merr) is independent of seed mass and of the parent plant, yet is necessary for production of viable seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1981; 32: 615-620.
- Garcia X, Hong T, Ellis R. H. Seed dormancy and germination of Ficus lundellii and tropical forest restoration. Tree Physiology. 2005; 26: 81-85.
- Lin S, Chen Y, Zhao N. Seed germination and seedling establishment of Ficus microcarpa L. International Workshop on Education Technology and Training & Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2008; 2: 189-193.
- Kumar A. C, Chitra C. R, Bindu, Pillai P. Seed germination and storage studies in Ficus krishnae C. DC. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2008; 13 (1): 66-72.
- Edwards D. G. W. Maturity and quality of tree seeds- A state of the art review. Seed Science and Technology. 1980; 8: 625-657.
- Felton A. M, Felton A, Wood J. T, Lindenmayer D. B. Diet and feeding Ecology of Ateles chamek in a Bolivian Semi humid Forest: The Important of Ficus as a staple Food Resource, International Journal of Primatology. 2008; 29 (2): 379-403.